Prediction of Cing-Yang Meng vs Nebojsa Peric Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Meng vs N. Peric

Cing-Yang Meng
TPE
l
l
w
l
l
w
w
w
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
27
Age
33
5'9" (175 cm)
Height
6'1" (185 cm)
891
C. Rank
Ret.
844
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Ambidextrous
Plays
Right-Handed

Nebojsa Peric
SRB
w
l
w
l
l
w
l
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
27
Age
33
5'9" (175 cm)
Height
6'1" (185 cm)
891
C. Rank
Ret.
844
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Ambidextrous
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Meng 1 - 0 Peric
They have played 2 sets in total, with Cing-Yang Meng winning 2 and Nebojsa Peric winning 0. The last match between Cing-Yang Meng and Nebojsa Peric was at the Chinese Taipei F3, 26-10-2016, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Cing-Yang Meng getting the victory 6-3 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Meng | 1 |
| Peric | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Chinese Taipei F3(10-26-16)
Cing-Yang Meng
6
6
Nebojsa Peric
3
0
C. Meng vs N. Peric H2H Profile
C. Meng vs N. Peric Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cing-Yang Meng has won 44.16% of points on their second serve, while Nebojsa Peric has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cing-Yang Meng, in recent form, has won 41.38% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nebojsa Peric has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 23.58% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cing-Yang Meng has saved 52.94% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nebojsa Peric has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cing-Yang Meng has won 44.44% of matches played (W/L 4/5), with Nebojsa Peric winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cing-Yang Meng has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 39/31), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 29% (W/L 2/5). Nebojsa Peric has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 6/10), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/1).
- Player level: In the last year, Cing-Yang Meng has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50.00% of matches (W/L 4/4), where as Nebojsa Peric has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Cing-Yang Meng winning 1 times and Nebojsa Peric being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Cing-Yang Meng winning 2 and Nebojsa Peric winning 0.
- The last match between Cing-Yang Meng and Nebojsa Peric was at the Chinese Taipei F3, 26-10-2016, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Cing-Yang Meng getting the victory 6-3 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:8:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cing-Yang Meng has played against opponents with an average rank of 168.78 while Nebojsa Peric has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cing-Yang Meng has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nebojsa Peric has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cing-Yang Meng has converted 30.43% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nebojsa Peric has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Cing-Yang Meng vs Nebojsa Peric Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Meng vs N. Peric H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:8:0 | Average Match Time | 1:8:0 |
| 75% (40/53) | 1st Serve % | 72% (28/39) |
| 73% (29/40) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (15/28) |
| 46% (6/13) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (5/11) |
| 80% (4/5) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/2) |
| 49% (19/39) | Return Points Win % | 34% (18/53) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Meng 48%, Peric 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Meng 45%, Peric 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Meng 51%, Peric 0%.
C. Meng Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-7(5) 6-4 7-5 | ||
R2 | L | 6-7(3) 6-1 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 1-6 6-4 6-2 | ||
Q3 | W | 5-4 ret. | ||
Q1 | W | 2-6 6-4 10-6 | ||
N. Peric Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-2 6-1 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-1 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 4-1 ret. | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 6-1 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-2 6-3 | ||

C. Meng vs N. Peric Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 49.78% (112/113) | YTD Win/Loss | 34.71% (42/79) |
| 49.30% (248/255) | Sets Win/Loss | 35.88% (94/168) |
| 49.64% (2341/2375) | Games Win/Loss | 43.68% (999/1288) |
| 48.63% (71/75) | Hard Win/Loss | 37.50% (6/10) |
| 55.71% (39/31) | Clay Win/Loss | 34.62% (36/68) |
| 22.22% (2/7) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.12 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 265 | Aces Total | 28 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.04 |
| 315 | Total Double Faults | 49 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 334.26 | Average Opponent Rank | 336.79 |
| 68% (6393/9363) | 1st Serve % | 66% (635/957) |
| 62% (3991/6393) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (373/635) |
| 49% (1440/2969) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (136/322) |
| 42% (320/761) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 34% (33/96) |
| 37% (3245/8882) | Return Points Win % | 38% (362/956) |
| 22.22% (2/7) | Challenger W/L | 12.50% (1/7) |
| 50.93% (110/106) | Futures W/L | 36.28% (41/72) |
| 51% (110/216) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 35% (39/113) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 49% (25/51) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 33% (6/18) |
| 59% (35/59) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (15/27) |
| 86% (111/95) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (42/35) |
| 14% (111/15) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (42/6) |
| 14% (114/16) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (79/8) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
07:00 PM 19/11/25
Prediction05:30 PM 19/11/25
Prediction12:30 PM 20/11/25
Prediction04:00 AM 20/11/25
Prediction04:00 AM 20/11/25
Prediction12:30 PM 20/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

18 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Eva Vedder vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 19th November 2025 Best Bets

18 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Shintaro Mochizuki vs Federico Arnaboldi Prediction – ATP Bergamo Challenger – 18th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
20:00
H2H 1-0
13:55
H2H 0-0
14:15
H2H 0-0
15:00
H2H 0-0
15:20
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Santiago
Chile
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M15 Tallahassee
United States
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Austin
United States
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Luanda
Angola
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal